Talk:Charlotte Shelby

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group.

Women's History Low‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

King Vidor vs. Sidney Kirkpatrick[edit]

One of the references claims that Taylorology lists 100 errors in King Vidor's investigation of the Taylor case. However Taylorology actually lists 100 errors in Sidney Kirkpatrick's book "A Cast of Killers". While the book claims to be an account of King Vidor's investigation, it's impossible to tell whether the errors are are the fault of King Vidor's research, Kirkpatick's research of Vidor's research, a faithful description of various witnesses incorrect testimony or (most likely) a combination of all three.Revmagpie (talk) 04:52, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Gibson's confession[edit]

While Gibson's confession is important to the Taylor case, it doesn't have anything to do with Shelby, so it doesn't really have a place in this article. Since it is completely uncorroborated to this point, it shouldn't be presented as exonerating Shelby in the Taylor case.Revmagpie (talk) 04:52, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Gale, you've had 2 YEARS to argue against my proposed deletion, and have offered nothing to support it's continued inclusion. Gibson's confession has nothing to do with Shelby's life and therefore no place in this article. Also, reverting a change you didn't like (despite never taking the opportunity to discuss) and marking it as a minor change is dishonest.

Revmagpie (talk) 00:24, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've added a source. Given Shelby has long been suspected of the murder, Gibson's reported confession has everything to do with the topic and is helpful to readers. Gwen Gale (talk) 09:40, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Whatever. I'm not going to try and compete with your Gibson fetish. Gibson has nothing to do with Shelby, simple as that.Revmagpie (talk) 19:26, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Charlotte Shelby. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101201100627/http://silent-movies.com/Taylorology/Taylor84.txt to http://silent-movies.com/Taylorology/Taylor84.txt

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:29, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]