Talk:Charles Alexander, Grand Duke of Saxe-Weimar-Eisenach

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Ancestry Section[edit]

Since titles are used, for consistancy's sake, use titles for all entries in the chart. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cladeal832 (talkcontribs) 19:04, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Incorrect, when the ancestry charts were first being implemented, they were being linked as the article titles did or should appear, according to WP:NC(NT) and also to avoid redirects. They are going to be changed back to that form for the sake of consistency with article titles and with WP:NC(NT), which is a standard for article titles. Wikipedia is not consistent for all royals and WP:NC(NT) only gives consistency for groups of royals, such as monarchs, consorts and other royals. Charles 20:20, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I am reverting the edits again as Cladeal has not come to the talk page to discuss them as instructed by the administrator. This issue is now at WP:AN/I. The reason for reverting is to avoid superfluous, unnecessary titles that don't appear in the article titles and which do not add anything to the article. There is not reason to add these titles, not even a standard. The only standard for naming articles is WP:NC(NT). Charles 03:06, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]


What's wrong with redirects? 24.57.196.130 04:26, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Talk:William I of Württemberg#What's wrong with redirects?. Charles 04:57, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Language[edit]

I have tried to convert the article into clear English. I have not entirely succeeded: I have no idea what the clauses about "samaritan" and "how/as" mean, and unfortunately I don't know German. Maproom (talk) 17:52, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Charles Alexander, Grand Duke of Saxe-Weimar-Eisenach. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:29, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]