This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
This article was nominated for deletion on June, 8 2014. The result of the discussion was nomination withdrawn.
I just created a page for the centre of defence and international security studies and linked it in so that people searching for UK think tanks will find it. I strongly disagree that this page comes under the unremarkable people, groups, companies and web content criterion as CDiSS is a major uk think tank that actively advises both governments and companies in a similar way to other major uk think tanks such as RUSI.
Munger 85 12:35, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I can't see how speedy deletion can be suggested here. There's an obvious (and to my mind convincing) claim of notability. I'll removed the tag. JQ 12:43, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
If people follow attribution policy and cite ample independent and reliable sources, there's rarely a problem. Thanks for the info. --ROGERTALK 14:51, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]