Talk:Carpobrotus modestus

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted from this draft on 3 April 2020 by reviewer Dan arndt (talk · contribs).

Australia: Biota Low‑importance

	Australia portal Carpobrotus modestus is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian biota (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Plants Low‑importance

	Plants portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The article is in large part about a completely different plant?[edit]

There are facts cited about Carpobrotus edulis, a South African plant with conspicuous yellow flowers, with no explanation at all of why they are relevant to C. modestus, an Australian plant with pink flowers. There's often a disproportionate US and European slant in articles about plants from the Southern Hemisphere, with a heavy emphasis on how they act outside their native range and any invasive behaviour. But I have to say that the article being focused so heavily on an entirely different plant is a first. I will try and address this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by PeoplesFootscray (talk • contribs) 23:58, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]