Talk:Carlo Garavaglia

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

He managed a Serie A team,even if only for just one match. He has also a long career managing teams in Serie C1. On wikipedia you keep managers who managed teams in League 1,why do you want to cancel this? I think it's not a good article,but it can be a stub--Der Schalk (talk) 20:35, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm thinking the line is drawn such that people who only coached because the regular coach was ill don't fall on the notable side. There does not seem to be any indication of enduring notability. —ShadowRanger (talk|stalk) 20:41, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Ok,that's reasonable. But he also managed in Serie C1,the third level of Italian football. I've seen on wikipedia many articles about third division managers of different countries,do you think that if i add in the page this information we can keep it?--Der Schalk (talk) 21:09, 30 November 2009 (UTC)In Wikipedia you also keep third division players,so why can't third division managers be kept?--Der Schalk (talk) 21:15, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Carlo Garavaglia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:42, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]