Talk:Canadian Medical Association

Medicine Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Canada Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Anybody[edit]

Anybody know the name of the first woman President? Trekphiler ™ 04:40, 24 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Possible expansions for this article[edit]

Perhaps the extent of the involvement of the Queen in this origination would be an acceptable expansion for this article? --68.145.99.4 (talk) 17:31, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Neutrality and Quality of article is lacking[edit]

The CMA is a lobbyist group, like the AMA. The article as is has promotional/biased opinion and where there are concrete facts, these are unsubstantiated/uncited, leaving them as assertions without any evidence. Furthermore, its mention of "accrediting" educational programs is highly problematic and misleadingly suggestive. Provinces have "colleges of physicians" as they do "colleges of dentists/teachers" which are regulated by government and offer an official license to practice. If the CMA offers some kind of certificate of approval, for example to universities, it should be noted that this would be legally irrelevant as they do so on a national basis, while health care regulation is split between provincial and national governments in a Federal country like Canada. So any educational programs that are certified by the CMA would not be certified in any professionally meaningful way. As a more opinionated note: the CMA is a highly self interested lobby group and it is presented here as a kind of pseudo-charitable, allied-with-government institution. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.137.229.117 (talk) 01:13, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]