Talk:Camellia oleifera

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Odate's specific comment about Camellia oil (footnote 5) is non-specific as to the species of Camellia traditionally used for protecting metal tools. In fact, his exact remark is that vegetable oil is a suitable protector, and that he uses "Camellia oil" for personal and sentimental reasons (as it reminds him of his childhood). Akahige719 07:04, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unreference statement[edit]

"And rich in vitamin E, D, B and calcium, zinc, and other trace elements. The medical experts and nutritionists as "flowers of life" Zinc, the content of soya bean oil 10 times."

Can anyone find the reference for the above statment? Shrimp wong (talk) 03:00, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cut and paste moves[edit]

I added template {{R from merge}} at Tea-oil Camellia because part of the edit history of this article is there. Actually, it was probably a cut-and-paste move to there, and a cut-and-paste move back to here, so if somebody knows a better way to fix it, go ahead. Gene Nygaard (talk) 22:32, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Camellia oleifera. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:20, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]