Talk:Camella

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Tambayan Philippines Low‑importance

	Philippines portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tambayan Philippines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to the Philippines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Tambayan PhilippinesWikipedia:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesTemplate:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesPhilippine-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

tle[edit]

who’s the owner of the camelia home’s and what’s the connection of the owner of camelia home’s to crop production. 122.49.222.42 (talk) 14:02, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

bakit may connection ang may ari nang camilla.home 122.49.222.42 (talk) 14:03, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Logo[edit]

It is clearly stated on Wikipedia:Logos that "reasonable diligence should be taken to ensure that the logo is accurate and has a high-quality appearance", therefore implying that SVG formats, which are far more superior to raster versions (PNG, JPG, etc) are highly preferred. There's someone who keeps on reverting the logo to the raster version which is undesirable and therefore destructive and vandalizing. Therefore, the current SVG logo version should always be the top choice and must be kept as it is, unless the subject undergoes a rebranding and changes their logo, which an SVG version of it should be prioritized as replacement on the infobox 223.25.62.92 (talk) 10:57, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]