Talk:Byrne & Co v Leon Van Tienhoven & Co
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Inaccurate text[edit]
The text of this judgement is poorly constructed. It doesn't seem to be the actual judgement or snippets thereof ("the contract is completed the moment the offer is posted" - legal nonsense, "Harris's Case; Dunlop v Higgins, even although it never reaches its destination." - grammatical nonsense) and if it is a paraphrase then it is a confused one. Unfortunately, I'm not able to find the actual text of the judgement anywhere to correct this - someone who does have access to it could improve the article a great deal by making it make sense. - 137.120.88.73 (talk) 17:26, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
What was being sold?[edit]
What is a 'tinplate'? The article says '1000 boxes of tinplates', which links to 'tinning', the act of plating a metal item with tin. Doesn't make sense in context... --StarChaser Tyger (talk) 06:21, 7 May 2012 (UTC)