Talk:Business operations

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

untitled[edit]

I corrected the first sentence to make it clearer.--71.108.76.247 19:21, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

the first sentence does not belong here. only the second is correct for this concept.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Business operations. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 22:39, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Business studies grade 10[edit]

Term 1 41.114.195.253 (talk) 15:47, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright Violation, Maybe?[edit]

I found a book named Critical Management Studies: Perspectives on Information Systems. It has pages (295-296) which almost verbatim match large portions of the article. I assumed the article copied the book, but the book was published in 2009. The content was added to this article in 2005. Could it be that the book plagiarized from Wikipedia? FredTruly (talk) 00:45, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I confirmed that the text in Wikipedia predates the 2009 book. I searched in Google Books to see if there were any results before 2005 but the results I found were from 2009 to 2011. As the Wikipedia text is from 2005, it looks like the book copied from Wikipedia. MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 03:34, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
wonder how often that happens Generalist1 (talk) 02:40, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]