Talk:Busby

This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.DisambiguationWikipedia:WikiProject DisambiguationTemplate:WikiProject DisambiguationDisambiguation articles

Requested move 28 December 2019[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved (second moved to Busby (military headdress)) (closed by non-admin page mover) DannyS712 (talk) 02:56, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Busby (disambiguation) → Busby
Busby → Busby (clothing)

– No clear primary topic given the places and the fact that its a common surname. Note that although Matt Busby is a PTM he gets over 5x as many views and comes up on all the Google results apart from 2 for the film (which doesn't exist here). Busby (military) and Busby (hat) are also possibilities. Crouch, Swale (talk) 19:06, 28 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

- There is a good case for changing the present Busby to Busby (military headdress) to avoid confusion with the fairly numerous surname articles, as noted above. Busby (hat) or Busby (clothing) would be too imprecise - the fur cap is exclusively an item of military uniform. Buistr (talk) 19:37, 28 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nomination. No WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. As for the choice among "(clothing)", "(military)", "(hat)" and "(military headdress)", I would support "(military headdress)" as providing the most apt description. —Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 07:34, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support moves, the 2nd to (military headdress), because the military headdress is not clearly the primary topic. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 11:20, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.