Talk:Burgher

This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.DisambiguationWikipedia:WikiProject DisambiguationTemplate:WikiProject DisambiguationDisambiguation articles

What does the Finnish word porvari have to do with any of this?

Djakarta Burghers[edit]

There is also a Dutch Eurasian community referred to as Burghers in Djakarta. RichardBond (talk) 01:58, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 26 September 2017[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Not moved. bd2412 T 01:50, 4 October 2017 (UTC) Burgher → Burgher (disambiguation) – In order to make way of a proper article, Burgher (title) with an overview on the European, Medieval/early modern title. Chicbyaccident (talk) 17:40, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Provisional support. If there's an actual article to move it to, then I would likely support. If not, though, then we risk the article not coming to fruition, and the base name redirecting unnecessarily to the dab page. Good article idea, though. Dohn joe (talk) 18:21, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose (for now). Create the article first, then propose the move. — AjaxSmack 00:08, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose personal preference for simpler names being disambiguations , specific things having more specific names MfortyoneA (talk) 20:23, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Chicbyaccident, this kind of RM never works. Users need to see an article first, please see Burgher (title). In ictu oculi (talk) 13:50, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, In ictu oculi (talk · contribs)! Chicbyaccident (talk) 18:08, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose - it's not clear that Burgher (title) is the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC anyway. (The article has only just been created.) St Anselm (talk) 21:40, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose no evidence that Burgher title is primary over, say, Burgher people. The fact that it's taken 16 years of WP to create this article, and even then only as a result of this RM being started, suggests it's not high on the list... — Amakuru (talk) 10:56, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.