Talk:Bullionism

Economics Low‑importance

	Business and economics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

History Low‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

The Bullionism I learned about had nothing to do with mercantilism and the keeping of gold. Bullionism was a school of thought that held that a money-issuing bank will not cause inflation as long as it does not increase the amount of paper or credit money to a level above the amount of coin (bullion) that would have circulated in a purely metallic money system. The debate was most active from 1800-1810. David Ricardo was a prominent bullionist, while Charles Bosanquet was a prominent antibullionist. Google "bullionism new school CEPA" for more. I might delete this article and rewrite if I don't hear back from someone.128.125.38.162 18:52, 6 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think you should delete it. But if bullionism can mean different things, perhaps a disambiguation page is in order? Make a new page about the definition you know. --Oracleoftruth (talk) 18:43, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

--- I think the text as in this version written is rendering the one-sided (polemic) attitude of A. Smith about the mercantile system. Compare with that:

"Smith's fundamental proposition that "money is not wealth" constituted his basic polemic against mercantilist doctrines. For the most part, however, Smith posed this particular argument against a mercantilist strawman of his own construction. What he lacked in 1763 in his attack on mercantilist analysis was (1) a theory of aggregate demand that clearly excluded the money supply als an independent variable and (2) a theory of aggregate supply in which the independent variable was unaffected by changes in the money supply."

Robert E. Eagly: The Structure of Classical Economic Theory. Oxford University Press, New York London Toronto 1974. p. 72.

See also: Joseph A. Schumpeter, (Elizabeth B. Schumpeter, Hg.): Geschichte der ökonomischen Analyse. Erster Teilband. Vandenhoeck Ruprecht Göttingen 1965. p. 448f., 453.

--Meffo (talk) 10:00, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]