Talk:Brian Kilmeade

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Controversies[edit]

This Wiki is awfully one sided. Controversies outweigh the bio. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.120.197.66 (talk) 00:31, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • new* Can someone please add the controversy about Brian Kilmeade(BK) and transgender Chaz Bono on Dancing with the Stars, where BK says on Fox and Friends that Chaz's injured knee is the "one part of chaz that hasnt been operated on"? I've never edited a wiki article, and from what I can tell, BK has some salad tossers that lurk on this page and remove bad things about hi, and they'll get whatever I write thrown out on a technicality.

http://equalitymatters.org/blog/201109270014 http://mediamatters.org/print/blog/2012/10/19/fox-ironically-supports-spirit-day-after-months/190773 http://www.glaad.org/news/fox-friends-chaz-bonos-quickstep http://www.glaad.org/blog/fox-news-still-transphobic-despite-progress

First link has video, the others are just 'proof of 'controversy. Also, why aren't BK's comments about LGBT's in here, under controversies? Pat Robertson's wiki page has a bunch of his anti-gay quotes under controversies, because to say those things is controversial. I dont see why Brian Kilmeade's words on tv are any less controversial than Pat Robertson's. If anything, we all know pat robertson is gonna say that stuff, but people also deserve to know that BK has said similar things.

That would probably be because Pat Robertson has achieved fame as an anti-gay bigot — and an influential one at that, while Brian Kilmeade hasn't. Thus, anti-gay comments are an important part of Pat Robertson's biography, while they aren't an important part of Brian Kilmeade's. Your apparent feeling that Brian Kilmeade should be considered a famous anti-gay bigot aside, what matters is popular opinion rather than any one or two or three Wikipedian's. Tasteless anti-gay jokes just don't rise to the level of serious (or seriously meant) anti-gay militancy on legal, social and religious issues. - Nunh-huh 20:48, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Brian Kilmeade. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:57, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

racist controversies[edit]

someone should add a section about his asking a black co-host if she "makes kool-aid" JointCompound (talk) 12:53, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I also think there should be a mention of what his own ethnic background and his wife’s are. Based on the surnames it seems likely they are of Irish and Italian descent, respectively. If true, that would mean his infamous “here in America, we marry Italians and Irish” comment was most likely an attempt at self-deprecating humor. That comment currently has its own section in the article but there is no mention of whether it was self-referential or not (even though it’s still a cringeworthy comment either way). 2604:2D80:6984:3800:0:0:0:AD07 (talk) 04:36, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Terminally stupid section[edit]

One section reads as follows:

"Photoshopped picture of Judge Bruce Reinhart"

"In August 2022, while serving as the fill-in-host of Tucker Carlson Tonight, Kilmeade shared a digitally-altered photo of federal magistrate Judge Bruce Reinhart receiving a foot massage from convicted sex offender Ghislaine Maxwell."

The word "photoshopped could mean anything or nothing — a slight change in the skin tone of one single pixel, for example.

If the photo is faked, then say so. If it is not faked, then say so. If the authenticity of the photo is not known, then say so.

Otherwise there is no point in including this section in the article, since it contributes exactly zero relevant information, and to make matters worse, is misleading. 2601:200:C082:2EA0:1DCF:F1D5:D2A:BCBE (talk) 02:54, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • I think this is one of the worst articles on Wikipedia. It's largely a documentation of controversial sections he has been involved with. Obviously WP:CSECTION and WP:NOTNEWS violations. The whole thing is terminally stupid.LM2000 (talk) 11:57, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    There are secondary RS sources about the content in that section, so it passes NPOV. Additional sources and framing can be found. It's appropriate to convey his views so long as we don't frame them as controversy in cases where no such controversy is documented. They're still his statements found noteworhty by RS that reported them. SPECIFICO talk 14:50, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Conservative gentleman[edit]

Hi looking for a conservative gentleman who comes from a close family How old is your son. My daughter is 28 is the HRManager for Goyard for all the boutiques in the US we are from a close Italian/polish family 75.97.70.237 (talk) 23:23, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

He did not infringe journalistic ethic standards[edit]

He works for FOX as a commentator, therefore, he can work for Donald Trump's administration freely. 181.194.242.250 (talk) 00:17, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Brian_Kilmeade&oldid=1210511234"