Talk:Boxcar Rapids

Oregon Low‑importance

	Oregon portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oregon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Oregon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OregonWikipedia:WikiProject OregonTemplate:WikiProject OregonOregon articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
The current collaborations of the month are Women's History Month: Create or improve articles for women listed at Oregon Women of Achievement (modern) or Women of the West, Oregon chapter (historical).

Nomenclature[edit]

Are rapids the same as waterfalls? I'm thinking they aren't. USGS classes "falls" and "rapids" separately. Katr67 (talk) 06:35, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I am really not sure... why do you ask? smithers - talk 16:12, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Uh, I ask because you put this article in Category:Waterfalls of Oregon and also added the Oregon waterfalls template. I've already removed them until it is determined that rapids=waterfalls. Katr67 (talk) 19:04, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This picture is not Boxcar Rapids. This is Whitehorse rapids, some 20 miles upstream of Boxcar.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Boxcar Rapids. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100918191258/http://boaterpass.com/maps/map4info.htm to http://www.boaterpass.com/maps/map4info.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:55, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Original research[edit]

Clenaed up the citation to account for historical statements categorized as original research. No facts appear to remain that are not corroborated by citations. Fimbriata (talk) 03:40, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]