Talk:Book of Exalted Deeds

This page was proposed for deletion by Piotrus (talk · contribs) on 3 December 2019.

This article is within the scope of the Dungeons & Dragons WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Dungeons & Dragons-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, or join the discussion, where you can join the project and find out how to help!Dungeons & DragonsWikipedia:WikiProject Dungeons & DragonsTemplate:WikiProject Dungeons & DragonsDungeons & Dragons articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

D&D to-do:

view

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Merge : Various articles
Stubs : Dungeoneer's Survival Guide, Swords & Spells, Variant Dungeons & Dragons games, More...
Update : Rewrite to be out-of-universe: Companions of the Hall, Dark Sun, Elf (Dungeons & Dragons)
Verify : add sources to novels planned for merge to List of Dragonlance novels
Other : Collaboration: Dave Arneson, Drow (Dungeons & Dragons)

Comments by Penwhale[edit]

- I think we can work on this. -Penwhale | Blast the Penwhale 15:27, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In particular, I'm trying to find a reasonably reliable source that discussed the fledgling controversy invoked by BOED's tacit acceptance of homosexuality. It would make for interesting parity with the BOVD article, at the least. Serpent's Choice 08:42, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No such luck on my end. Coming up bupkus. -Jeske ^{(v^_^v)} 23:22, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It is cataloged by the LOC(Library of Congress) http://lccn.loc.gov/2005618946. I've seen it at least two local libraries as well. So it does at least meet the minimum threshold standards, but not notability notability. CharlesLupton (talk) 22:17, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Does a linked article in Wikipedia count? if so what about the D&D Controversies Article. "The more 'extreme' manuals, specifically the Book of Vile Darkness and the Book of Exalted Deeds, bear a "For Mature Audiences Only" label." Which link to this and the Vile Darkness article. CharlesLupton (talk) 22:42, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Whether D&D itself requires more than a single page on Wikipedia is a matter for the community as a whole, but we shouldn't be tagging things piecemeal for deletion. If each of the manuals is going to get a page, classes get pages, etc, then the entire thing becomes a compact reference and discussion of the details of D&D/AD&D and becomes more useful to anyone looking for knowledge on the topic. If the entire D&D project should really be moved off to another wiki - I don't have a dog in that fight - but we shouldn't be playing Jenga with the articles composing it. 18.84.5.70 (talk) 20:57, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reviews[edit]

I moved the External reference to Reviews with a full citation. Thnidu (talk) 17:58, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sources[edit]

There are some possible reviews indicated here under "Linked items": [1] although I do not have access to any of those sources. BOZ (talk) 16:58, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

DeProdded[edit]

I have added several revierws, as well as new sourced explanatory material to the wiki. Still needs some work, but I believe it is at least notable and Start class, so I have DeProdded it.Guinness323 (talk) 07:00, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]