Talk:Bonnington

UK geography Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Kent Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Kent, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the county of Kent in South East England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.KentWikipedia:WikiProject KentTemplate:WikiProject KentKent-related articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Kent tasks:

Here are some Kent related tasks you can do:

Clean up an article: Here are automatically generated lists of articles needing cleanup sorted alphabetically and by category.
Edit the Top and High importance articles.
Refine/polish: Ashford, Royal Tunbridge Wells, Canterbury
Expand:: List of churches in Kent, Maidstone Borough Council
NPOV: K College
Citation needed: Unreferenced Kent articles
Cleanup/Copyedit: Kingdom of Kent
Expert attention: Channel Tunnel, Bromley Civic Society
Stubs: see Kent geography stubs articles

Note: These articles may overlap with those on other related lists. If you would like to make a change, either do so yourself, or make a suggestion.

Comments[edit]

I take it that the major part of this article is wiki and NOT lifted wholesale from here!, which is absolutely word-for-word? Whichever it is, there are several glaring mistakes. The article starts with the statement "Bonnington is a small village ..." and then says (lower down) "There has never been a village ... - which is it? It has a parish church, and an old one at that, the usual sign of a village. The map [1] certainly doesn't give the impression of being that scattered either.

The reference above says that Bonnington and Aldington have separate parishes, their parish councils meet as one. Why cannot the article say that: and not "linked with". Where are the facts that say "only a small proportion" (how small?); "mainly inter-bred" (what is the conclusion from that?); "the majority of ... work in nearby towns or London"? And as for "healthy fondness for cider" (statistics?); and the industry (or commerce) of prostitution - there's only a hundred of them altogether, for heaven's sake! Finally Ford Madox Ford - he doesn't say anything like that on The Pedlar leaves the bar at Dymchurch - -read it!

This article deserves 1 out of 10 for its performance! Peter Shearan (talk) 15:16, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation page desirable[edit]

If any administrator would like to note, there is no disambiguation page for this Bonnington and Bonnington, Edinburgh. Since I don't know how to create one, perhaps someone else is willing to do it? Kim Traynor (talk) 23:32, 31 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Bonnington. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:44, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]