Talk:Boanthropy

Psychology Low‑importance

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Medicine: Psychiatry Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Psychiatry portal This article is supported by the Psychiatry task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Disability

Boanthropy is within the scope of WikiProject Disability. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.DisabilityWikipedia:WikiProject DisabilityTemplate:WikiProject DisabilityDisability articles

Refocus on the medical[edit]

I stumbled over old AfDs on this article and I was almost tempted to renominate it. Instead I found a few medical sources to show that this is not just nonsense spun up to justify something in the Bible. I think we need to go further here. We need more medical sources and explanation. I think the Bible stuff is OK as it is, now that it is not pretending to be historical, but that the psychoanalytical stuff is greatly over-covered and may have elements of improper synthesis. I'm not even sure how relevant the bit about "Totemism" is at all. Should we remove that completely? --DanielRigal (talk) 16:41, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]