Talk:Bernard Moffatt

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Vandalism[edit]

Please note that a certain person seems intent to vandalise the pages on Bernard Moffatt, Mec Vannin, Celtic League (political organisation). It seems each time, information that they are uncomfortable with for some reason, is removed. The vandalism has come from two separate IPs, and has removed links and historical facts. ImpartialCelt 17:16, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)

It's (im)Partial celt who has the problem with historical fact, even going as far as to invent a policy for Mec Vannin that has never existed.

So why remove quotes that Bernard Moffatt actually said, and relevant links unless you're just trying to vandalise the article? You're obviously uncomfortable with certain hard facts. Isn't Mec Vannin republican, taking a strong stance on the oath to the queen that MHKs are supposed to take and which they don't agree with? Why doesn't Mec Vannin stand in many elections then? - ImpartialCelt 15:09, 11 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
You have falsely stated that the artifacts campaigns are an issue of B. Moffatt's personally. You vandalised the correct statement, that he acts on requaets from the branches. If you ever manage to get anything factually correct, it will stay.
Your apparent dislike of the military monitoring is YOUR POINT OF VIEW. If you wish to express your point of view, make that clear.
It is not "my point of view", since I didn't write it in the first place. Nor that thing on Mec Vannin you called a "stupid comment". It is made clear that the military monitoring thing is a dislike of "some". It is also factual that it doesn't appear in the Celtic league's aims (read them if you don't believe me).
Mec Vannin's constitution states that it will contest elections. That policy has never been challenged. One individual in the party has refused to stand again after the law made candidates decalare themselves to be British if they were Manx. The oath is a concience issue and the party has never issued any position.
If this is the case, why don't quote the relevant section. When was the last time Mec Vannin did contest an election? Or got elected?
When your misinformation was removed, you tenaciously restored it.
Removing weblinks and actual quotations from people is misinformation. Why?
You have an agenda.
So do you. Wikipedia isn't meant to read like Pravda.
If you continue to make malicious accusatiuons of vandalism against the people who are attempting to maintain accurate and factual information, then do not be surprised when an official compalint of vandalism is made against you.
And as long as you keep vandalising pages, you'll find the vandalism disappears. Grow up.--ImpartialCelt 18:12, 15 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]