Talk:Berman and Company

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Business

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Companies Start‑class Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Start This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

United States

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Sorry flowanda[edit]

Sorry flowanda. Misread some of the changes you had made to the article. It's a known PR firm with a high awareness of its internet image, so I scrutinized them overmuch. Addisonstrack 21:49, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bwah-ha-ha-ha-ha! Gee, I suck at evil laughs...but no problem...and I don't mind scrutiny at all. :) Flowanda | Talk 23:57, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Warning: Lobbyists Berman and Company at work[edit]

This article has been edited anonymously by Berman and Company, who are lobbyists for amongst others the American Beverage Institute, the Center for Consumer Freedom, the Center for Union Facts and the Employment Policies Institute.

IP address of 66.208.14.242 traces to Berman and Company, see the Whois report. I Spy With My Big Eye (talk) 11:06, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Good that there are people on the lookout for this kind of thing :D! I'll be going at that users edit with appropriate vigor. But first I'm removing some of the uncited claims. I searched for "employs razor-sharp wit and unconventional tactics to annoy, unsettle and, some say, intimidate its opponents" but could only find it here http://www.jewishworldreview.com/0803/nanny_science.asp (hardly the chicago tribune). So removed. Sean Heron (talk) 20:17, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

removing POV tag with no active discussion per Template:POV[edit]

I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:

This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:

There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.

Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 15:01, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sources[edit]

Incomplete income section[edit]

How is a bill to a single client in 2012 relevant to the overall income? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jdabs (talk • contribs) 17:38, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]