Talk:Bencher

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Talk:Bencher

It is completely incorrect to say that junior barristers are emembers of the inner bar. This is topsy turvy. When becomes a Senior Counsel, one joins the inner bar.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Ourlad (talkcontribs) 15:59, 10 January 2007

Well, the cited reference from the Inner Temple describes the historical position thus:
... students took part in vocational exercises known as moots ... At first the students watched the proceedings from within the 'bar' of the 'court', and were known as 'inner barristers' (a term which fell out of use). When qualified to argue points of law, they moved outside the 'bar' and became outer (or utter) barristers. ... They were subsequently entitled to sit on the bench at moots and became known as Masters of the Bench (or Benchers). ...
Do you have any references for senior or leading counsel being described as the "inner bar"? (Incidentally, you can sign your posts on talk pages with four tildes, thus: ~~~~). -- ALoan (Talk) 16:28, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Bencher. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:59, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]