This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
The construction banner did not disappear after saving my recent edit. Requesting help with secondary editor reviewing my work.Rachmaisley109 (talk) 16:09, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I removed the construction banner, removed a press release, and did some minor cleanup. Personally I don't think "the person madel lists X, Y and Z" adds anything to our readers' understanding of the person, unless it's accompanied by enough context to understand why they made the lists. Huon (talk) 17:51, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered.
The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.
I was hoping the Belinda Johnson article could be updated to clarify she still serves on Airbnb's board of directors. I have a conflict of interest here, so does an uninvolved editor mind updating the article body and infobox, per CNBC, which says, "Johnson isn't leaving Airbnb entirely. She will join the company’s board of directors as its ninth member and third woman."? Thanks in advance.JK Airbnb (talk) 18:18, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@JK Airbnb:, Where is the reliable source showing she's left the company as an executive, and she's a board of director that speaks in the present tense? Also, the article has a promotional tone to it; several blocked IPs, and a single purpose has worked on it. Has it been worked on by other paid editors? Graywalls (talk) 23:39, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Graywalls - The article does have an overly promotional feel to it. I will take a crack at cleaning it up and giving it a more neutral NPOV. Go4thProsper (talk) 02:08, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
"Johnson also serves on the board of directors at PayPal. She was ranked one of Forbes 100 Most Powerful Women in 2017 and 2018." having this in the lede certain seems to embellish favorable POV unduly. The undisclosed paid editing is quite obvious when you browse the edit history and those contributor's edit history. When the article looks to have an unnatural positive spin and there's evidence of undisclosed public relations editing, I think the UPE template is due. Graywalls (talk) 02:11, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
