Talk:Beit She'arim necropolis

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Name of this article[edit]

Since this article is primarily about Beit She'arim and hardly at all about the national park that now protects it, it seems to me that the name of the article should be Beit She'arim (as it once was). Zerotalk 12:09, 19 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think someone changed it to differentiate this article from modern Beit She'arim. If you have been to the site, you can see where the Arab village was, next to the necropolis - certainly not on top of it.--Gilabrand (talk) 12:18, 19 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Mazar says that the Beit She'arim settlement (not the necropolis) "was situated on top of the mound" and occupied an area of more than 100 dunams at the height of its prosperity. (Mazar, Vol 1, p14). Various sites connected with the settlement, like the synagogue, are on the various slopes of the hill. The necropolis "is spread in a semicircle on the northeastern, northern, and western slopes of Tell Beth She'arim [the hill], and on the slopes of adjoining hills to the the north and west". (p20) In other words it was a lot more extensive than can be seen by a visitor today. (I have been there, since I have friends in Tivon, but I don't remember much.) The hill on which the Beit She'arim settlement sat is the same as the one on which Sheikh Bureik sat - not only is that stated by both Conder and Mazar, but the PEF map of 1880 showing Sheikh Bureik and the mound shown in Mazar's topographic maps match up exactly. Zerotalk 12:37, 19 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

@Zero0000 and Gilabrand:Still not the right name. What about changing the modern place's name to "Beit She'arim (moshav)", and leave this one as "Beit She'arim", period! I guess that most Eng. WP readers who look up Beit She'arim have the ancient site in mind - World Heritage site, national park, Judah the Prince... Slightly stronger claim to fame than the moshav. ArmindenArminden (talk) 03:59, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with you. Zerotalk 08:51, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Identity of hill[edit]

The Beit She'arim and Sheikh Bureik were on the same hill is stated on page 13 of Mazar's book. But since I have it front of me I'll copy what Claude Conder wrote much earlier (Tent work in Palestine, Vol. 1 (1879), p161-162):

Sheikh Abreik stands on the site of an unknown town of no little importance. To the west the hillside is completely undermined by extensive excavations and systems of tombs which required many days to examine. Under the town is one called "the Cave of Gehenna," and on the hill is another consisting of chamber within chamber, the first entered being painted with palm branches, ivy-leaves, and other mortuary emblems in red; in one tomb the inscription "Parthene" is written in Greek, in another we found graves unopened, and the entrances most carefully closed; but unfortunately the roof had fallen in, and all that our excavation brought us was a delicate little tear-bottle, the glass oxidised by age, and covered with a prismatic crust which scaled off easily.

Zerotalk 12:20, 19 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Someone who knows more about this might want to add something about this[edit]

Greg Ross talks about a Mystery Slab of Beth She’Arim which was excavated in a cave near the sacred Galilean catacomb of Beth She’Arim in 1956, when a bulldozer unearthed an enormous rectangular slab, 11 × 6.5 × 1.5 feet. Rather than try to move the 9-ton mass, workers at first paved over it. Seven years passed before anyone thought to examine it closely.

It was one gigantic piece of glass. He states that it is unknown who made it or exactly how. Evidently an ancient furnace had produced great batches of molten glass that could be cooled and broken into reworkable pieces. This batch had been abandoned, perhaps because contamination had ruined its clarity.

See ref

Johann.H.Muller (talk) 19:55, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have read quite a lot of professional archaeological writing on this site and never saw anything like this. It sounds very much like a myth. Zerotalk 00:34, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
No myth, it's actually on display at the site. A quick search on Google Scholar also produces several results. It's a remnant of the extensive glass industry in the region during the Roman and Byzantine eras. See here and there photos on the net as well. Poliocretes (talk) 09:12, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page[edit]

Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request it's removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

  • http://israelinphotos.com/gallery10-BeitShearim.htm
    Triggered by \bisraelinphotos\.com\b on the global blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 18:42, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Resolved This issue has been resolved, and I have therefore removed the tag, if not already done. No further action is necessary.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 06:07, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Still missing: city remains, maqam, Zaid statue[edit]

Who takes up the task? Synagogue, olive oil plant, basilica, weli of Sheikh Ibreik (see Sheikh Bureik), equestrian statue of Alexander Zaïd? Also: more catacombs, semicircular structure.... ArmindenArminden (talk) 05:30, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds like Arminden would do a great job... Zerotalk 08:54, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Zero, thanks for the flowers :-) I'll go for some paid job this time, for a change... For whoever feels like it, don't forget the story of how they tried to steal Mr. Zaid cum horse and send him to be melted down in China during the crazy days when metal prices shot through the roof. The guardsman of the pioneer years, victim of thieves! Most of the stealing was done by Arabs, like in the good ole' days with cattle, but the shipment went through Ashdod port, with port officials keeping both eyes firmly shut. Now, that's cohabitation & normalisation! Btw, daylight saved the statue. Slow thieves, I must say. Wouldn't happen in Romania. Enough political correctness for one day, I'm off! Cheers, ArmindenArminden (talk) 12:23, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Beit She'arim National Park. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:46, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Beit She'arim National Park. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:51, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 9 February 2021[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved (non-admin closure) (t · c) buidhe 19:12, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Beit She'arim National Park → Beit She'arim necropolis – This article primarily treats on the necropolis found in the Beit She'arim National Park, at least 95% of its content. The necropolis is not the only site of interest in the Park, although it is perhaps the most important. There is also a former Roman-era village by the name "Beit She'arim" located in the same Park (a place later called Sheikh Bureik). Any change of title to "Beit She'arim necropolis," will also make mention of the fact that its location is within the Beit She'arim National Park. Davidbena (talk) 14:33, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Beit_She%27arim_necropolis&oldid=1213543388"