Talk:Beatrice Lascaris di Tenda

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Beatrice Lascaris di Tenda. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:43, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Possible article renaming[edit]

I just completed a revision of the article, which had fallen behind current research and perpetuated the mistaken identification of Beatrice as a member of the Lascaris of Tenda family. While there is no doubt as to her being a Cane by both birth (daughter of Ruggero di Odoardo) and by her first marriage (wife of Facino di Manuele), as established in the 1950s, much of the historiography still reflects the old and mistaken conclusion that she was a Lascaris of Tenda. For this reason I have hesitated renaming/moving the article, while correcting the information within and providing and annotating an explanation of the historiographical confusion. Nevertheless, perhaps renaming the article to (e.g.) "Beatrice, Duchess of Milan" or even "Beatrice Cane" is to be considered, presumably with a redirect. The Dizionario biografico degli Italiani (volume 7, 1970) calls her Beatrice, duchessa di Milano ("Beatrice, Duchess of Milan"). — Preceding unsigned comment added by StefThrax (talkcontribs) 08:58, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Based upon the names listed in List of Milanese consorts, I think that Beatrice of Tenda would be appropriate. Peaceray (talk) 14:21, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for the input. The problem is that the list was inaccurate on the point, and that "Beatrice of Tenda" is no improvement on "Beatrice Lascaris di Tenda" -- except perhaps seemingly in cutting down to one erroneous association (Tenda) from two (Lascaris di Tenda), which was really the same thing. I am correcting the list to reflect the contents of this article (and modern historiography). StefThrax (talk) 15:33, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]