Talk:Battle off Ulsan

Military history: Maritime / Asian / Japanese / Russian & Soviet

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	Asian military history task force
	Japanese military history task force
	Russian, Soviet and CIS military history task force

Japan: Military history Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 21:53, May 9, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by the joint Japanese military history task force.

WikiProject Japan to do list:

Peer review: Kako River (Japan)
A-class review: None

Featured content candidates –

Articles: None
Pictures: None
Lists: None

Good article nominations: Pure Japanese, Vinland Saga (TV series), Japanese destroyer Ume (1944), Mai Fujisawa, Godzilla Minus One
Add requested images to articles that need them.
Pages for Deletion: Participate in Japan-related deletion discussions.
Improve and expand Japan-related stubs.
Create some requested articles.
Help translate an article from the Japanese Wikipedia into English.
Assess unassessed articles

Korea Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Korean military history task force.

Russia: History / Military Low‑importance

	Russia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the history of Russia task force.
	This article is supported by the Russian, Soviet, and CIS military history task force.

Title[edit]

I suppose the the title should be Battle of Ulsan with one f. --91.64.179.230 12:09, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Point of views[edit]

What are the differences betfeen "Order of battle" and "Russian point of view"? And whose point of view we have in the order of battle? It should be combined under one Title possibly with some authorised remarks. --VetMax (talk) 16:12, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Something missing?[edit]

..."during the Russian turn" - ummm, what Russian turn? It appears a portion of the narrative is missing. Maury Markowitz (talk) 17:34, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Why is the article called "Battle off Ulsan" and not "Battle of Ulsan"?[edit]

I don't see why we keep this simple grammatical mistake. User:Tetizeraz. Send me a ✉️ ! 23:41, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nevermind, someone explained why the title has two "f"s. User:Tetizeraz. Send me a ✉️ ! 00:35, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]