Talk:Battle of Wadi Akarit

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

CE[edit]

Did a drive-by tidy of refs etc.Keith-264 (talk) 21:33, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Class field altered to C to conform with assessment.Keith-264 (talk) 21:44, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Tidied citations and used sfn's, hope no-one minds. Keith-264 (talk) 08:54, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Great job, thanks. Shire Lord 20:04, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
At least one bugger's paying attention ;O) Keith-264 (talk) 21:06, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Indeed! Still in the process of expanding the battle but need more sources, in particular 51st division's attack. The problem is rooted in company actions rather than brigade/division. Shire Lord 21:31, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
B S Barnes is helpful for a worm's eye view.Keith-264 (talk) 21:32, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Will look into it. Thanks. Shire Lord 21:43, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Battle of Wadi Akarit. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 20:07, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]