Talk:Batman Confidential

Comics: DC Comics / Batman Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Related work groups:
/
	This article is supported by DC Comics work group.
	This article is supported by Batman work group.

Joker's Origin[edit]

Admittedly I missed that specific issue but care should be taken in declaring something not canon over the Joker's origin story. As I recall, the Joker himself has said that he enjoys making up differing origins for himself and at least once, declaring that he has a hard time remembering which one is true. Lots42 (talk) 16:00, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, the story is not in the Joker's perspective, & this whole series is like a retcon to Batman's history after Crisis on Infinate Earths wiped the slate clean for anything that happened before the 80s, so yeah, it's canon. The wounds Batman gave Joker on the face that he had to stich up have to be restitched in Batman 663 & in Do You Understand These Rights the Joker identified Batman in disguise which goes with the Joker not being suprised or caring about seeing Batman without his cowel in Batman RIP & the little suggestive knowing when the Joker laughed at Bruce Wayne in A Death in the Family. When Jason Todd showed up as the new Red Hood, I sure don't recall Batman saying anything about it being the Joker's old identity. Also, there's no indication on issue one that the series happens in the Elseworlds.

Another thing....since Superman Confidential, followed by Superman:Secret Origins is supposed to be the new Superman canon, you can pretty much guess the same thing with Batman Confidential. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.17.118.100 (talk) 11:49, 28 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Comics B-Class Assesment required[edit]

This article needs the B-Class checklist filled in to remain a B-Class article for the Comics WikiProject. If the checklist is not filled in by 7th August this article will be re-assessed as C-Class. The checklist should be filled out referencing the guidance given at Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment/B-Class criteria. For further details please contact the Comics WikiProject. Comics-awb (talk) 15:31, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

C-Class rated for Comics Project[edit]

As this B-Class article has yet to receive a review, it has been rated as C-Class. If you disagree and would like to request an assesment, please visit Wikipedia:WikiProject_Comics/Assessment#Requesting_an_assessment and list the article. Hiding T 14:50, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Do You Understand These Rights.[edit]

There is a possibility that this is either a tip-of-the-hat to or a retelling of "Joker:Devil's Advocate." —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.17.118.100 (talk) 09:29, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Continuity.[edit]

If this is the new canon, doesn't it trump the continuity of Ledgends of the Dark Knight? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.17.118.100 (talk) 04:31, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]