Talk:Batik Air Flight 6723

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Feedback from New Page Review process[edit]

I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 01:04, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback from New Page Review process[edit]

I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: I have to mark this as unreviewed again because after further reading this may not pass the notability bar.

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 10:44, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

add this article to the proposed for deletion[edit]

it isn't a serious accident, no one was injured, the plane wasn't damaged and a lot of other instances of pilots falling asleep aren't on wikipedia. also the event didn't have serious consequences and recived little coverage. 2001:B07:A3B:23C1:10B5:743:468D:FE15 (talk) 10:36, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Just because it wasn't a serious accident or nobody was injured, doesn't make it non notable. Both pilots are regulated to be awake or one has to be awake when the other is sleeping. This incident also is extremely rare and had potential to cause a disaster. Also note that a duration of 30 minutes is crucial when nobody is in control of a cockpit. This is just my opinion but maybe other incidents like emergency landings aren't really worth an article since its way more common. GeekyAviation (talk) 00:13, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed. Also, wait for the final report to decide notability. Garnercx (talk) 13:16, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If you would like to get this article nominated, you can go to Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion, where you can request that someone nominate an article for you by also adding a reason as to why. Aviationwikiflight (talk) 04:16, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]