Talk:Basidiomycota

Headline text

this stuff is actualy interesting — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.53.110.61 (talk) 23:11, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

(no matter how long and boring it may seem) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.76.145.185 (talk) 23:37, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

Number of species

The page for Basidiomycota says it contains 22300 species, making up 37% of known fungus species. The ascomycomycota page says it has 12000 species, making up 75% of known fungus species. This is a problem. Both pages require expert attention, but I don't know how to mark them that way. --Savant13 14:07, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

I agree there is confusion. Until checked in The Dictionary of the Fungi (2001), I think the two sets of numbers should be removed. A new edition is being prepared which will have more numbers.Heliocybe 12:53, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

Sounds like my Science Professor

Ouch. This article needs MAJOR cleanup- there's all these scientific words and no explaination what they mean. I can't get any information off this thing. --AK-17 18:48, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

One annoyance

This is annoying
In some of the scientific pages in Wikipedia there is not a word orgin for the division, or kingdom, name. Also no enviroment is given —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.10.186.175 (talk) 23:51, 12 April 2007 (UTC).

I don't know what you mean by "not a word origin" or by "no environment". Please explain your thoughts further if you would like an explanation.Heliocybe 13:27, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

Have added the meaning of the word Basidiomycota and where its members live — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.10.186.175 (talk) 16:54, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

Mushrooms In The Pic

The mushrooms in the "Basidiomycota" pic/gif/jpg/whatever are rather fantastic in appearence. Can someone name them so that whoever was curious about them, could look them up? Thank you!24.83.178.11 15:34, 16 May 2007 (UTC)BeeCier

honestly you need to put those words in a type of average language —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.225.51.41 (talk) 16:21, 14 August 2009 (UTC)

Walleniomycetes should not say no phylum

They obviously do have a phylum, Basidiomycetes, if they are listed on this page. 216.165.95.64 (talk) 15:54, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Basidiomycota. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071025221100/http://www.bio.utk.edu/mycology/ATBI/Photos/12000to12099/12074.jpg to http://www.bio.utk.edu/mycology/ATBI/Photos/12000to12099/12074.jpg
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070927203256/http://www.pnwfungi.org/pdf%20files/manuscripts%20volume%201/pnwf20069.pdf to http://www.pnwfungi.org/pdf%20files/manuscripts%20volume%201/pnwf20069.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:22, 28 October 2016 (UTC)