Talk:Bank of Khyber

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Business

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Notability[edit]

This bank had an IPO. I don't see that in WP:CORP as grounds for notability. I also don't see much basis for the idea that this coverage is independent. I'm going to re-add the notability template in the hopes that we can determine whether or not there is other notability-building coverage. I'll note that this exists in talk in the edit summary. If other editors feel really strongly that this article is clearly notable, I won't re-add it a third time. Erechtheus 02:19, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Being on a stock exchange is considered notable under WP:AFDP. --Marriedtofilm 04:20, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I can't see any remarks on IPO at WP:AFDP, you probably misread something. And I agree with Erechtheus: having been studying external links of the article last week, I found all of them advertisement-like. No analysis or criticism. This concerns referenceness, not exactly notability. But IPO is about notability of course. And local IPO is rather about anbsence of notability :) The recent removal of notablity tag was unmotivated cause we're supposed to change something or discuss when removing. I'll be back to this discussion after a few hours break. -- Futurano 09:26, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I conducted additional WP research and found new information on article's unnotability. The Karachi Stock Exchange (where the IPO took place) appears to be very notable. But the bank is not mentioned either there, or in the stock exchange listing, or even in the List of banks in Pakistan. So I'm restoring not only the notability tag but also its original date. The next step is merger proposal and I'll make it within minutes. -- Futurano 16:16, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There are several World Bank articles on banking in Pakistan that mention the bank. Also the Swiss development corporation worked with the bank doing microlending. And the Abbottabad development corporation mentions the importance of the bank for small enterprise work. All these web references were found doing a simple google of bank of khyber. I am not sure at all what makes a bank notable. I can't see anything that says any other than references in sources beyond basic press release items. This is a regional bank taht was setup up near the beginning of the economic relaxation of Pakistan's finance system. It provided micro loans, and has been one of the last state owned banks to become privatized. For Pakistan, I think it is probably a very notable bank. Does that make it notable enough for the Engliswh.wikipedia? I really have no clue. Jvv62 03:50, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bank of Khyber. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080414060608/http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=2006 to http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=2006

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:48, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Bank of Khyber. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:16, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]