Talk:Balboa (dance)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Old talk[edit]

Query of this edit: 18:58, 18 February 2006 68.122.144.242

This edit removed a link to an external article on the history of Balboa published on the lindycircle web site. The link to balboanation was left in place. The page on lindycircle is an original article that has been widely copied and/or linked to by other Balboa web sites. In fact the Balboanation website uses a copy of the lindycircle article for it's own definition of the dance.

The result being that the single remaining external link (balboanation) is second generation info whereas the external link to the original source article (lindycircle) has been removed. The balboanation link should rightly remain since their web site is a good reference on the subject. I just question the logic of removing other valid external references?

Deleted lists[edit]

With all due respect, if they are "famous," please write articles, with references and all, per wikipedia's verifiability, WP:CITE, "reliable sources" rules. `'mikka 02:36, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Famous dancers from 1930s & 1940s[edit]

Famous Present Day dancers[edit]

Quality[edit]

IMHO the article is not high-quality yet. For example Pure Balboa vs. Bal-Swing is very badly explained. The "basic footwork" given is just one very common variation. If you want to start with an "8 count basic", it should be explained as "step-step-hold, step-step-hold". Figures are badly explained and/or include stuff that shouldn't be there (for example, Texas Tommy doesn't require the lead to heel-slide).

IMHO, it should start with Pure Balboa and the body lead, then introduce the common 8-count pattern and the different common holds (up-holds, downhold, shuffles, break), then introduce some one-steps to mix in. One-Steps can then be combined to make 'bigger' moves (e.g starting on 5: right-close-down, left-close-down to create a Waltzer-like movement. Pivots by turning on downholds. etc.).

Next it could delve into Bal-Swing, Transition Step, Throwouts. These differ substantially from Pure Balboa, because they are lead quite differently. Of course they are part of Balboa (that's why they belong into the article), but they are of a different nature. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.174.126.165 (talk) 18:07, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Agreed, the article is no high quality...--Twobarbreak (talk) 15:59, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Balboa derived from Collegiate Shag?[edit]

According to streetswing, Balboa was derived from Shag (and others, of course)? http://www.streetswing.com/histmain/z3bal1.htm

Maybe Single-time collegiate shag? That would fit the Balboa basic quite well.

Does anyone have a better reference than streetswing? (Like, a printed one such as a book?) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.174.115.52 (talk) 02:49, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]


No you will not find any proof that Balboa came from Collegiate Shag, because Balboa came before Shag... as you can see from streetswing website, there are never any resources.--Twobarbreak (talk) 16:00, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]