Talk:Back to Whitechapel

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page should not be speedy deleted because...[edit]

This page should not be speedily deleted because... (your reason here) --Folvil (talk) 17:43, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The novel is now up to 10 000 sales in France and Canada; It has been reviewed by many papers (national and local) and on mnay blogs. There is a large consensus over the literary quality, as for the historical researches that precede the writing. The author went many times to London for preparing the book, (ex: became a reader at he National Archives in Kew, visit the medical files in the Wellcome Institute in Euston Road…, and is a member of the Whitechapel Society). Here is a link to a press review since the release of the book in France. http://www.retour-a-whitechapel.com

The book is in dealings for a prompt release in english.

OK, this is a novel, a fiction work, but the elements included are mainly based over the facts as reported by the 1888 papers and the archives still available. So, I think the article deserve to stay in Wikipedia. Thank's for reading.

Copyedited[edit]

WikiProject iconGuild of Copy Editors
WikiProject iconThis article was copy edited by a member of the Guild of Copy Editors.

PaintedCarpet (talk) 16:59, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Back to Whitechapel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:38, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]