Talk:Azad Kashmir/Archives/2022
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 14:23, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
@Uanfala, there is consensus regarding india-pakistan related topics see here, in past there were many cases of disruptive editing in india-pakistan related topics, so there is a mutual consensus that no one can do any kind of edit which doesn't strictly apply to wikipedia policies, so this map which is a part of a disputed territory of Kashmir, there is a consensus that only full maps with dotted boundary showing regions administered by both countried should only be used, see Jammu and Kashmir (union territory), this article is about the indian-administrated territory, there is not even a single map which doesn't show the rest of the territory with dotted line. so this map is a clear violation of Wikipedia:Neutral point of view policy and should not be used. Uttarpradeshi (talk) 17:15, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
- The map is clearly labelled as "Districts of Azad Kashmir", which it depicts correctly. I don't see a problem with it.
- Showing full maps of the disputed Kashmir is a policy made for the infobox images. You are getting confused. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 19:59, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
@Kautilya3, so are you saying that we can use similar kind of map Jammu and Kashmir (union territory) here also, which shows districts of jammu kashmir UT?? Uttarpradeshi (talk) 06:31, 12 September 2021 (UTC)- I would prefer if the entire Kashmir region is shown in outline. But it is not a requirement. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 12:31, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
@Kautilya3 so if that is the case, then can i ask why that map, discussed above on this page on 15 august, is removed when requested by some now blocked user?? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Uttarpradeshi (talk • contribs) 16:10, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
- I would prefer if the entire Kashmir region is shown in outline. But it is not a requirement. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 12:31, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
Page name
The page name should not be Azad Kashmir. It is not neutral and representing a biased point of view. It should be Pakistan Occupied kashmir or POK. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 169.2.30.8 (talk) 22:46, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
As it is controlled by Pakistani Military therefore this should be recognised as Pakistan occupied Kashmir Prem kumar Bagui (talk) 08:49, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
Religion
The section on religion contains a diagram that claims to represent the results of the 2017 census and rather surprisingly states that there are some Hindus and Buddhists in so-called Azad Kashmir. However, the cited references contain no such information. I propose that the diagram should be removed unless proper sources can be found. --176.72.91.203 (talk) 18:53, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
Languages: number of speakers
Taimoorahmed11, great find with the statistics yearbook! I was wondering about the language figures in this edit. How did you calculate them? I can see a relevant table on p. 140 (p. 192 in the file), but it only gives the data for each of the districts, not the whole territory. And also, puzzlingly, it says the source for this data is "Kashmir Liberation Cell, Muzaffarabad". Any idea if this is reliable? – Uanfala (talk) 03:25, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
- @Uanfala: Thank you! I had been trying to find some statistics for the languages spoken in AJ&K and G&B for a long time, so I guess G&B is left.
- I calculated the mean from all districts, as listed names of places are names of all the districts of Azad Kashmir, which essentially meant it was the data from the whole territory, just divided into districts. I did also note that it sourced "Kashmir Liberation Cell, Muzaffarabad", which I did a little research and from what I can infer, is that it is related to the government of Azad Kashmir, and I assume that they're the ones who have ordered the "Kashmir Liberation Cell" to conduct this census/survey. On their website1 (and website2 - which is on the domain of the official AJ&K website), they also link websites to the President/Prime Minister/Government of Azad Kashmir as well as Govt of Gilgit Baltistan.
- The reason, I went ahead, despite the limited knowledge on the reliability of the "Kashmir Liberation Cell", was because the data provided matched with the overall representation/perception that was provided from the sources on the wiki article + I really wanted a pie chart for that page :D.
- Do you think this data is reliable enough to be used? :
>> Taimoor Ahmed(Send a Message?) 03:43, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
- I don't have a clue about the reliability of the data. The fact that most but not all of the percentages are multiples of 5 or 10 suggests these may have been guesstimates rather than the results of a survey. But I guess we'll have to work with the sort of data we've got. So you've taken the average of the figures for the districts? You know, this would work only if all the districts had the same population. But they don't: you need to weigh the language percentages by the populations. – Uanfala (talk) 03:57, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
- @Uanfala: Yeah, definitely not 100% accurate, for sure but it gives a better insight with some actual data. Data on population by district is most likely published, would it be more accurate to calculate the numbers of speakers per district, take the total number per district and then combine it with all of the districts and then calculate the percentage of the entire territory that way? :
>> Taimoor Ahmed(Send a Message?) 04:47, 25 January 2022 (UTC)- P.s. Altered the figures, calculated with district populations. :
>> Taimoor Ahmed(Send a Message?) 05:29, 25 January 2022 (UTC)- The Kashmir Liberation Cell. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 12:21, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
- Kautilya3, I'm not sure I can connect the dots here. What should we conclude about the reliability of the language figures? – Uanfala (talk) 22:00, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
- I guess we have to accept Sumantra Bose's characterisation of it as a "research body". We don't have any other data anyway. Obviously a full census would be ideal, which we don't have and they don't have either. They probably came up with some informed estimates. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 23:56, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
- Ah, OK. Well, in that case we'll keep the figures. Taimoorahmed11, the source numbers for your calculation are pretty rounded (e.g. 60, 35 etc), while the results are really precise (68.42..). This is phantom precision: the numbers of speakers aren't known to so many significant digits. The result of a calculation like this one should be presented to the level of accuracy afforded by the sources. – Uanfala (talk) 00:26, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
- @Uanfala: How do you propose the data to be set out? Perhaps one decimal place max? :
>> Taimoor Ahmed(Send a Message?) 01:07, 26 January 2022 (UTC)- I had the same issue when I looked at the chart. I think there should be no decimal places, and Shina should be merged into "Others". -- Kautilya3 (talk) 11:51, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
- I've made some changes to the chart. :
>> Taimoor Ahmed(Send a Message?) 13:38, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
- I've made some changes to the chart. :
- I had the same issue when I looked at the chart. I think there should be no decimal places, and Shina should be merged into "Others". -- Kautilya3 (talk) 11:51, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
- @Uanfala: How do you propose the data to be set out? Perhaps one decimal place max? :
- Ah, OK. Well, in that case we'll keep the figures. Taimoorahmed11, the source numbers for your calculation are pretty rounded (e.g. 60, 35 etc), while the results are really precise (68.42..). This is phantom precision: the numbers of speakers aren't known to so many significant digits. The result of a calculation like this one should be presented to the level of accuracy afforded by the sources. – Uanfala (talk) 00:26, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
- I guess we have to accept Sumantra Bose's characterisation of it as a "research body". We don't have any other data anyway. Obviously a full census would be ideal, which we don't have and they don't have either. They probably came up with some informed estimates. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 23:56, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
- Kautilya3, I'm not sure I can connect the dots here. What should we conclude about the reliability of the language figures? – Uanfala (talk) 22:00, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
- The Kashmir Liberation Cell. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 12:21, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
- P.s. Altered the figures, calculated with district populations. :
- @Uanfala: Yeah, definitely not 100% accurate, for sure but it gives a better insight with some actual data. Data on population by district is most likely published, would it be more accurate to calculate the numbers of speakers per district, take the total number per district and then combine it with all of the districts and then calculate the percentage of the entire territory that way? :
- I don't have a clue about the reliability of the data. The fact that most but not all of the percentages are multiples of 5 or 10 suggests these may have been guesstimates rather than the results of a survey. But I guess we'll have to work with the sort of data we've got. So you've taken the average of the figures for the districts? You know, this would work only if all the districts had the same population. But they don't: you need to weigh the language percentages by the populations. – Uanfala (talk) 03:57, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 4 July 2022
 | This edit request to Azad Kashmir has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Change Azad Kashmir to Pakistan Occupied Kashmir 142.52.203.5 (talk) 04:17, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
Not done for now: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the {{edit semi-protected}}template. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 09:00, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
Urdu readded
presumably the consensus to keep Indic scripts out still applies? the Urdu name in the first paragraph of the lead should be removed then. TryKid [dubious – discuss] 00:58, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
- Oh, what consensus? Uanfala (talk) 11:16, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
- Talk:Azad Kashmir/Archives/2021#Urdu in the lead. I see a consensus in favour of removing them, with only two editors, you and USSammo, opposing. TryKid [dubious – discuss] 11:53, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
Please add GDP (nominal) and (PPP) in the front box
Here's the source; https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Pakistani_administrative_units_by_gross_state_product
And please don't add the amounts directly in trillions, billions, millions etc.
For better understanding for our native people, use our currency measures e.g. Lakh, Crore, Arab, Kharab etc.
Here, let me convert it in PKR "Azad Jammu & Kashmir"
- GDP (nominal) (2021-22;est.)*
Total: Rs.1.91 Kharab (USD$8 billion) (GBP£6.5 billion) Per Capita: Rs.456,301 (USD$1,904) (GBP£1,564)
- GDP (PPP) (2021-22;est.)*
Total: Rs.6.94 Kharab (USD$29 billion) (GBP£23.8 billion) Per Capita: Rs.17 Lakh (USD$7,171) (GBP£5,892)
P.S.Kharab = Trillion
And I've converted all the figures in GBP because Pound (£) is widely used in AJ&k Muaz Rana (talk) 10:11, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
Not done - Wikipedia is not a reliable source. Furthermore, we use do not the South Asian numbering system as explained at MOS:NUMERAL and as per WP:Manual of Style # Opportunities for commonality - Arjayay (talk) 11:24, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
Devision Name of Azad kashmir
Devision name Of Azad kashmir 37.111.137.164 (talk) 18:50, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
No Urdu in the lede?
I don't see why adding Urdu in the lede is so controversial? It's the only official language of the region, why should WP:INDIC apply here? نعم البدل (talk) 07:47, 18 October 2022 (UTC)