Talk:Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Classification

New Zealand Mid‑importance

	New Zealand portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Australia Low‑importance

	Australia portal Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Classification is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Other research classification systems[edit]

Some mentioned at [1]

OECD's Fields of Science and Technology (FOS) 2007 classification
Eurostat's Nomenclature for the Analysis and Comparison of Scientific Programmes and Budgets (NABS) 2007 classification.
European Economic Community (EEC) Sciences Classification, a three level classification used within certain member countries of the EEC, particularly in Belgium; and
the US National Science Foundation (NSF) Classification, a two level classification used by that Foundation in the measurement of national science indicators.[2][3]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Classification. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130419084006/http://www.arc.gov.au/era/ANZSRC.htm to http://arc.gov.au/era/ANZSRC.htm
Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.adelaide.edu.au/dvcr/era/docs/newclass_mr31mar08.pdf
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090429043143/http://www.arc.gov.au:80/applicants/codes.htm to http://www.arc.gov.au/applicants/codes.htm
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090914162820/https://era.flinders.edu.au/rfcdcodes/ to https://era.flinders.edu.au/rfcdcodes/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:32, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]