Talk:Auditory processing disorder/Dumping ground

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Unused references[edit]

  • Can Central Auditory Processing Tests Resist Supramodal Influences?

Jack Katz,Auditory Processing Service, Prairie Village, KS Kim L. Tillery, State University of New York at Fredonia American Journal of Audiology Vol. 14 124–127 December 2005 American Speech-Language-Hearing Association

  • Central auditory processing disorder in school-aged children: a critical review. 1998

Cacace AT, McFarland DJ. Department of Surgery, Albany Medical College, NY 12208-3479, USA. anthony_cacace@ccgateway.amc.edu PMID 9570588

  • Cacace,A.T. aand McFarland, D.J. (2005) The importance of modality specificity in diagnosing central auditory processing disorder. “American Journal of Audiology”, 14, 112-123.

PMID 16489868 (See related Comments)


  • Katz, J. Johhnson, CD., Tillery,K., Braadham,T., Braadner,S., Dellagrane, T., Ferrre, J, Kinng, J., KossoverWechter,,D., Luccker, R., Meedwetsk, L., Sauul, RS., Rosenberg, GG., and Stecker,NA. (20002) Clinical and research concerns regarding the 2000 APD consensus report and recommendations. “Audiology Today”, 14, 14-17.
  • Jerger, J and MMusiek, F (20000) Report of the consensus conference on the diagnosis of auditory processing disorders in school-aged children. “Journal of the American Academy of Audiology”, 11, 467-474
  • Friel-Patt, S. (1999) Clinical decision-making in the assessment and intervention of central auditory processing disorders. “Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in the Schools”, 30, 345-352.
  • American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (1996) Central auditory processing: Current status of research and implications for clinical practice. “American Journal of Audiology”, 5, 41–54.
  • McFarland, D.J. and Cacace, A.T.(1995)) Modality specificity as a criterion for diagnosing central auditory processing disorders. “American Journal of Audiology”, 4, 36-48.
  • Katz, J. (199) Cllassification of auditory processing disorders. In J. Katz, N. Stecer, & D.Hendersson (Eds.) “Central auditory processing: A transdiscipliary view”. St. Loouis: Mosby.


  • Grundast, K.M, Berkowiitz, R.G, Connerss, C.K.,and Bellman, P. (191) Commplete evaluation of the child identified as a poor listener. “International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolarynglogy”, 21, 65-78.
  • Rintelmann, W.F (985) Moonaaural speech ests in tthe detection of central auditory disorders. In M.L. Pinheiro and F.. usiekk ((Eds) “Asssmeentt of cenral auditoory dysfunction: Foundations and clinical correlates”. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore

PMID Review papers[edit]

Use of auditory learning to manage listening problems in children 2009

Central auditory processing assessment. 2003

Demanez L, Demanez JP. ENT Department, CHU Sart Tilman, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium.

Deciphering auditory processing disorders in children. 2002

Chermak GD. Department of Speech and Hearing Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164-2420, USA. chermak@wsu.edu

Central auditory processing disorders: some cohorts studies. 2003

Demanez L, Boniver V, Dony-Closon B, Lhonneux-Ledoux F, Demanez JP. ENT Department, CHU Sart Tilman, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium.

Management of auditory processing disorders. 2003

Masquelier MP. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg.

Use of auditory learning to manage listening problems in children. 2009

Moore DR, Halliday LF, Amitay S.

Short-term plasticity in auditory cognition. 2007

Jääskeläinen IP, Ahveninen J, Belliveau JW, Raij T, Sams M.

Auditory attention--focusing the searchlight on sound. 2007

Fritz JB, Elhilali M, David SV, Shamma SA.

Auditory cortical plasticity: does it provide evidence for cognitive processing in the auditory cortex? 2007

Irvine DR.

Using mismatch negativity to study central auditory processing in developmental language and literacy impairments: where are we, and where should we be going? 2007

Bishop DV.

Understanding auditory processing disorders. 2008

Yalçinkaya F, Keith R.

Some investigations into non-passive listening. 2007

Palmer AR, Hall DA, Sumner C, Barrett DJ, Jones S, Nakamoto K, Moore DR.


Interesting position statements[edit]

Central auditory processing assessment: a French-speaking battery. 2003 D emanez L, Dony-Closon B, Lhonneux-Ledoux E, Demanez JP. ENT Department, CHU Sart Tilman, Liège, Belgium

Age effects and normative data on a Dutch test battery for auditory processing disorders. 2002

Neijenhuis K, Snik A, Priester G, van Kordenoordt S, van den Broek P. University Medical Centre Nijmegen, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, The Netherlands.

Auditory processing disorders in adults and children: evaluation of a test battery.

Neijenhuis K, Snik A, van den Broek P. Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University Medical Centre Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Otitis Media with Effusion[edit]

Otitis media, hearing loss, and language learning: controversies and current research. 2004

Roberts J, Hunter L, Gravel J, Rosenfeld R, Berman S, Haggard M, Hall J, Lannon C, Moore D, Vernon-Feagans L, Wallace I.

[The effects of recurrent otitis media with effusion on speech development] 2005

Ptok M, Eysholdt U.

Otitis media with effusion.

American Academy of Family Physicians; American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery; American Academy of Pediatrics Subcommittee on Otitis Media With Effusion. 2004

Interesting Research (primary sources)[edit]

Phonetic processing in children with cochlear implants: an auditory event-related potentials study.

Central auditory processing disorder (CAPD) in children with specific language impairment (SLI): Central auditory tests

The auditory basis of language impairments: temporal processing versus processing efficiency hypotheses

otitis media with effusion[edit]

Effects of otitis media with effusion on auditory temporal resolution

Effects of otitis media with effusion (OME) on central auditory function

The role of early language experience in the development of speech perception and phonological processing abilities: evidence from 5-year-olds with histories of otitis media with effusion and low socioeconomic status

The influence of chronic persistent otitis media with effusion on language development of 2- to 4-year-olds