Talk:Arnold Bennett/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Gog the Mild (talk · contribs) 13:17, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I shall have a look at this one. Gog the Mild (talk) 13:17, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"but achieved two considerable successes with Milestones (1912) and The Great Adventure (1913). He also had considerable success". Could we vary one of the "considerable successes"?
Consider moving note 7 into the main text.

And, erm, that is all I have, despite going through more in FAC mode than GAN. Gog the Mild (talk) 17:17, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for that, Gog. I've adjusted accordingly. Over to you. Tim riley talk 18:25, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()

3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()

Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed