Talk:Are We There Yet? (film)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Comments[edit]

on MTV cribs he said that he made the film so that if his kids friends asked what their dad did, they'd have something to show them that was kid-friendly (no swearing etc.). can this be confirmed? 82.46.179.159 21:42, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"Big" movie[edit]

It was Columbia's second biggest movie of 2005...

I'm not sure what "biggest movie" refers to. By gross profit, Columbia seems to have a number of higher ranked releases in 2005. --skew-t 08:03, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Move both. Jafeluv (talk) 16:10, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


– This film is not primary. The film, in fact, is less viewed than the TV series, but neither is primary for me. "Are we there yet?" is known as a phrase that children repetitively use while bored and impatient in cars. George Ho (talk) 17:05, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support/Oppose Support moving the film to "(film)" ; don't move the disambiguation page, instead redirect the current title here to the disambiguation page. -- 65.92.180.137 (talk) 06:10, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Why not? All uses of the phrase seem to use a question mark. --BDD (talk) 17:38, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support as there does not appear to be a clear-cut primary topic here, in terms of both page views and the general sense, so I am fine with disambiguating all topics that have this name. Also fine with renaming the disambiguation page. Erik (talk | contribs) 18:07, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support both moves. The exact ambiguous phrase includes the question mark. bd2412 T 05:05, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.