Talk:Are We Done Yet?

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Canadian cinema task force.
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Canada: British Columbia / Vancouver Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject British Columbia.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Vancouver (assessed as Low-importance).

Untitled[edit]

I went to the movies this weekend to see Unaccompanied Minors and there was a trailer for the movie that played, and yes it is Are We Done Yet? a sequel to Are We There Yet?. I will try to find the trailer.

1) Corrected grammar
2) Brian Levant directed Are We There Yet
3) It's pretty much a no brainer that if a film grosses a lot of money there'll be a sequel
4) If you say the original that means they wrote Mr. Blandings.
5) AND MOST IMPORTANTLY I'm not even sure this is a sequel to Are We There Yet as imdb.com state that it's called No Place Like Home

(Pally01 01:27, 12 February 2006 (UTC))[reply]

I've heard now that it is so ignore no.5 (Pally01 11:15, 12 February 2006 (UTC))[reply]

Why do you follow me everywhere where I edit? Are you stalking me? Cigammagicwizard 04:37, 12 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

1) Thomas Hayden Church HAS left the production (see [1].
2) Saying that the reason there is a sequel is because the first film made a lot of money is unnecessary. If that was the case you would find people saying it in films from Star Wars to Scary Movie.

(Pally01 12:22, 14 February 2006 (UTC))[reply]

Cigammagicwizard, I'm sorry but you are the one not reading them properly.

[2] from Empire Online "Steve Carr is still directing, but there’s been one other slight change to the plan: Thomas Hayden Church, who was signed to play a contractor who clashes with Cube as his house renovation turns to chaos, will now be busy working on a little superhero film. Maybe you’ve heard of it: bloke dresses up as a spider?

This means that as he is working on Spiderman 3 he will not have time to do "Are We There Yet?"

[3] from joblo "The rest of the cast is seeing some shake-ups as Nia Long is in talks to join the cast, once again playing Cube's wife and Thomas Haden Church, who would've been playing the contractor in charge of building the dream house, has dropped out"

I think this speaks for itself.

[4] from comingsoon "Gone from "Blandings" is Thomas Haden Church, who was going to play a contractor in the remake but now will be busy with Spider-Man 3."

Again, this says that he has gone.

I hope that this puts this arguement to rest. If both films are coming out next year then Haden Chuch will probably be contracted for re shoots and the like well into 2007 leaving him no time for "Are We Done Yet"

(Pally01 15:14, 16 February 2006 (UTC))[reply]

photo request[edit]

{{reqscreenshot}} Infobox has pic, specific request otherwise, please specify! SkierRMH 23:39, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

IMDb correction[edit]

If you go to Internet Movie Database, you'll see in Are We Done Yet? that the twins' names were never mentioned in this film.