Talk:Arcelor Mittal

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Arcelor Mittal redirect.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Luxembourg High‑importance

	Luxembourg portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Luxembourg, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LuxembourgWikipedia:WikiProject LuxembourgTemplate:WikiProject LuxembourgLuxembourg articles
High	This redirect has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

India Mid‑importance

	India portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Mid	This redirect has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Companies

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Business High‑importance

	Business portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
High	This redirect has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Move from "Arcelor-Mittal" to "Arcelor Mittal"[edit]

There is no "-" in the company name. See:

Official website
NYSE
Euronext
Google finance
BBC News
Financial Times
Forbes
MartinHagberg|MartinHagberg]] 15:48, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

I've now moved the page from Arcelor-Mittal to Arcelor Mittal. / MartinHagberg 15:59, 2 May 2007 (UTC)\[reply]

Move again?[edit]

When Arcelor Mittal launched their new brand identity, they started to write the company's name with CamelCase: ArcelorMittal. Should this article be moved to ArcelorMittal? MartinHagberg 12:56, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Agree. There should be no space in the title. Languagehat (talk) 15:26, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you see the company website, the name is always written without a space. I am an employee of the company and when the new brand identity was launched the company communications were VERY clear that the name must always be written as one word, with no space, no dash, and both the 'A' and the 'M' always capitalized. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.53.160.51 (talk) 17:54, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merge Archelor and Mittal with ArchelorMittal[edit]

I think not - they are both equals, it's not as if one giant company absorbed a small one. So you can't easily pull two full histories into 1 article. 82.211.87.61 10:50, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. Let Arcelor and Mittal Steel Company on its place with its history. --Jklamo 17:54, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Same here. If we do this we might as well merge all companies that merge.Nejee16 02:40, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disagree with merger I also agree. There is a tendency to merge all companies together; Arcelor and Arcelor Mittal have different histories. The articles should be linked, not merged together.--Scotchorama 12:19, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Absolutely not, as per above comments. Choalbaton (talk) 19:20, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No to merge - overall effect is to create a current events page, with loss of historical information. (removing tags - clearly not going to happen_>83.100.251.196 (talk) 00:52, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]