Talk:Arabella Kenealy

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group.

Medicine Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women writers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women in Red: 2017

This article was created or improved as part of the Women in Red project in 2017. The editor(s) involved may be new; please assume good faith regarding their contributions before making changes.Women in RedWikipedia:WikiProject Women in RedTemplate:WikiProject Women in RedWomen in Red articles

Article extremely biased[edit]

I would be surprised if the author of this article actually read Feminism and Sex Extinction. The items that were chosen to be highlighted are totally frivolous and paint her to be a looney. The book is actually very scientific and argues that sex differences were essential to the evolution of the species, which, given that the book was written not long after Darwin, was an exceptionally advanced argument which we know today to be absolutely true.

The frivolity of the misstatements and tabloid-like mischarcterizations read like an attack intended to undermine her otherwise very scientific work, as does the label "eugenicist" which was thought of in her time as a way to alleviate human suffering rather than as a racist exercise of supremacy that it became later. Historiaantiqua (talk) 02:17, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]