Talk:Aphasiology

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Linguistics: Applied Linguistics Low‑importance

	Linguistics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Applied Linguistics Task Force.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Medicine: Neurology Mid‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Neurology task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

English -> Swedish via Stroke[edit]

Hey, I've heard about a case involving a woman who was bought up in Sweden speaking fluent Swedish and then moved to the US and learnt American. She forgot all her Swedish over time and then in her 60s had a stroke. After the stroke she could only speak Swedish and not English. Does anyone have a reference for this, if so, please paste it here :) Thanks, - 139.222.214.183 13:19, 8 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

An error[edit]

The simplest example is sentences in the passive voice, such as "The boy was chased by the girl." Broca's aphasics may have quite a hard time realizing that the girl is doing the chasing, but they do much better with "The mouse was chased by the cat," where world knowledge constraints contribute to the correct interpretation. However, "The cat was chased by the mouse" would likewise be incomprehensible. This evidence suggests that grammatical competence may be a specific function of Broca's area.

The above is actually incorrect to the extent of my knowledge. Broca's aphasics perform at chance for cases with both improbable and neutrally-probable sentences. For example, they are equally-likely to ascribe chasing to the cat or mouse in the case where the mouse chases the cat; world-knowledge does not motivate them to prefer the cat chasing the mouse. I'm thinking of independent studies I've read by Zurif and Grodzinsky. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.36.66.142 (talk) 02:10, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Major cleanup[edit]

This article is almost all about Broca's area, not aphasiology in general; needs to be totally rewritten. I am currently involved in some other projects but I might take a stab at it when I'm free. Politizer ^talk/_contribs 14:25, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This article should probably be combined with the article on Aphasia. This article comments primarily on Broca's area and does not discuss the study of aphasia. M.C.LeRoy 6 March 2012 —Preceding undated comment added 20:16, 6 March 2012 (UTC).[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Aphasiology. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080112030553/http://www.tandf.co.uk:80/journals/titles/02687038.asp to http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/titles/02687038.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:07, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]