Talk:Apache Wicket

Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Java Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Java, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Java on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JavaWikipedia:WikiProject JavaTemplate:WikiProject JavaJava articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

Jonathan Locke said in theserverside.com that "...All of Wicket was written by yours truly starting the 3rd week of April, 2004...". So Wicket should have begun in 2004?--Friend2008 (talk) 15:42, 6 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'd like to add references on wicket components. As Wicket is classified as a component-based framework, people naturally like to know what components are available. In this regard, I found that although the basic ones are there (e.g. form, links, repeaters, date-picker, captcha, ...) still I don't find (or know where to find) some practical components like drop down menu bar, ..... (e.g. did http://www.mail-archive.com/wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net/msg15101.html come to a conclusion eventually?) Maybe can there be some sort of incubators for them ? (e.g. https://sourceforge.net/projects/wicketcomponent/) Friend2008 (talk) 04:45, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Help[edit]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, please place a new {{help me}} request on this page followed by your questions, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page.

!helper at Apache Wicket; multiple IPs have tried to insert/ revert a bot for the inclusion of what looks to be a relevant, valid publication (checked link); is this a blacklisted site, spam (despite the topic), a formatting problem, or something else? Dru of Id (talk) 15:10, 30 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Responded on IRC, but to summarize: The domain of the linked source is on XLinkBot's revert list because someone has earlier spammed URL addresses from that domain on Wikipedia. --KFP (contact | edits) 15:28, 30 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 5 external links on Apache Wicket. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 10:31, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 6 external links on Apache Wicket. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 10:02, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Apache Wicket. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20120425121249/http://wicket.apache.org/2011/11/14/wicket-1.5.3-release.html to http://wicket.apache.org/2011/11/14/wicket-1.5.3-release.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

N An editor has determined that the edit contains an error somewhere. Please follow the instructions below and mark the |checked= to true

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 05:36, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Can I run wicket on iPhone?[edit]

With Wicket we build web-apps, iPhone can run web-apps, but apps in Wicket are in Java, not iOS. So can you run wicket on iPhone (and WEB and Android)? רן כהן (talk) 04:25, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Apache Wicket. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:15, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]