Talk:Anti-terrorist policies of the Metropolitan police

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Anti-terrorist policies of the Metropolitan police article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Law Enforcement

	Law portal This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Law Enforcement. Please Join, Create, and Assess.Law EnforcementWikipedia:WikiProject Law EnforcementTemplate:WikiProject Law EnforcementLaw enforcement articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This page was proposed for deletion by Chachu207 (talk · contribs) on 2 December 2018 with the comment:
Out of date content, and article is based on original research
It was contested by Andrew Davidson (talk · contribs) on 2018-12-4 with the comment:
Deletion would not fix the problem and is not uncontroversial

Daily pageviews of this article

A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

Untitled[edit]

I think we need more references. I hope none of this is original research. Interesting reading though. Secret london 11:07, 8 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Its kindof hard to put references in this, because its based so much on verbal interviews and the like, and I dont have the transcripts any more. Chachu207 12:43, 3 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I've added "not verified" and "unsourced" tags to this article. No offence, it's an interesting and well-written article, but without verifiable references from reliable sources, it stands a good chance of being severely edited, if not deleted. Your claim that much of the article is based on verbal interviews implies that it is original research which is not allowed on Wikipedia, and there's also a bit too much speculation for my liking. --Canley 13:52, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

To be honest, i'm not bothered if it gets deleted. --Chachu207 ::: Talk to me 17:05, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I definitely don't want to see this article deleted. I've found several sources to back up quite a bit of the information in this article based on publicly-released reports from the Metropolitan Police Service and the Metropolitan Police Authority, so I'll have a go at rewriting the article and link to these reference sources. --Canley 08:09, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The links to SO19 & so13 have been removed as they are dead. http://www.met.police.uk/foi/pdfs/other_information/corporate/so19_introduction.pdf is an introduction to s019. http://www.met.police.uk/so/counter_terrorism.htm is info on counter terrorism. Secretlondon 19:17, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The link to the Indiana web site is just a ref to the mirror article [1] which 404s. Secretlondon 15:40, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]