Talk:An-Najm/Archive 1

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on An-Najm. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090424083652/http://www.usc.edu/schools/college/crcc/engagement/resources/texts/muslim/quran/053.qmt.html to http://www.usc.edu/schools/college/crcc/engagement/resources/texts/muslim/quran/053.qmt.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:24, 4 July 2017 (UTC)

Satanic Verses

It appears that mention of the controversy over the alleged "Satanic Verses" was removed several years ago without any discussion (or even mentioned of deletion on the history page). As I followed an internal link from the Satanic Verses article to get here, and a majority of the people using Wikipedia are most likely to get to this page following the controversy of the Satanic Verses, I believe that a mention of the debate over the Satanic verses is merited. 131.122.131.4 (talk) 17:29, 6 November 2010 (UTC)

+1 ebertek (talk) 18:03, 7 November 2015 (UTC)

Well, I could not have said it better myself. In Februari 2020 there was a little edit war about the Satanic Verses. Ending in not a single mentioning of them in the article. It should have a small section about these verses and a link to the article about the issue. Bastion Monk (talk) 14:34, 22 May 2020 (UTC)