Talk:Amar la Trama

Amar la Trama has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
September 28, 2010	Peer review	Reviewed
March 2, 2011	Good article nominee	Listed

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on September 30, 2010.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the album Amar la Trama by Uruguayan singer-songwriter Jorge Drexler was recorded in just four days?

Current status: Good article

Albums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

Latin music Low‑importance

	Latin music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Latin music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Latin music (music performed in Spanish, Portuguese and the languages of Ibero-America, see project scope for more details) on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Latin musicWikipedia:WikiProject Latin musicTemplate:WikiProject Latin musicLatin music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Amar la Trama/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: SMasters (talk) 07:56, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality:
Well written with no errors. I'm impressed with this.

B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
Complies to WP:MOS.
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources:
Properly referenced.

B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
One small thing. The reference for the chart performance should be placed at the chart, and not at the heading of the table. As it's a small thing, I've moved the ref, but it's worth remember for the future.

C. No original research:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:

B. Focused:
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
Complies to WP:NPOV.
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
Article is stable.
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
Images all check out.

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
Overall:
Pass or Fail:
All in all, an almost perfect score, with a few minor issues which I have fixed. It is not a requirement, but if you have a music sample, it would be nice to include it. I am confident that the article complies with GA requirements and standards, and am happy to pass this. Well done!