Talk:Al-Ma'mun al-Bata'ihi/GA1
GA Review[edit]
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Nominator: Cplakidas (talk · contribs) 12:10, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: UndercoverClassicist (talk · contribs) 13:23, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
I know very little about this period (certainly much less than the nominator), so will focus on prose, MoS and so on, with content points where I can. UndercoverClassicist T·C 13:23, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Is there any image at all that could be used to represent him -- I know portraits are unlikely, given the Islamic rules against them, but perhaps a signature or similar?
- I have looked far and wide, unfortunately nothing that is uniquely representative of him. Constantine ✍ 20:14, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- the all-powerful vizier: suggest being a little more specific: was the vizir actually omnipotent?
- Not entirely ;) have rephrased it to 'the de facto ruler of the state'.
- carried out a number of tax reforms: suggest cutting a number of (it could hardly have been otherwise). If the number is quite big, suggest several or many.
- Have removed it entirely as it is superfluous.
- Al-Bata'ihi also hunted down Nizari agents and sympathizers; the al-Hidaya al-Amiriyya, issued in 1122, rebuffed Nizari claims and affirmed the legitimacy of Musta'li Isma'ilism. : can we do anything in the lead to clarify a bit about who these people and what these beliefs are?
- Added a brief explanation both in the lede and the main body.
- In the Levant, attempts to take the offensive against the Crusaders failed, with the loss of Tyre and a naval defeat at the hands of the Venetian Crusade.: I'd put a date on these.
- Done.
- AH 478 (1085/6): you might consider clarifying this to "1085–1856 CE", as we're explicitly working between different calendars here.
- Good point, added the CE and AH wherever the two dates are given.
- nisba of 'al-Bata'ihi': I'd italicise rather than using single quotes, given the ' midway through the word.
- Done.
- Could we explain nisba -- something like epithet?
- Done.
- Hyphenate rags-to-riches as a compound modifier.
- Done.
- when he died in 1118, the funeral prayer was read by caliph al-Amir (r. 1101–1130).: I would cut the regnal dates here: they're only really useful when we don't know anything about the date except that it happened during someone's reign, but here we have a more precise one (1118).
- Good point, done.
- ghulams: something odd has happened here: the s is not italicised and not part of the link.
- This is deliberate, as this is an English plural of an Arabic word; the proper plural would be ghilman. I am indeed not sure whether I should not include the 's' in the italics, but then it would give the false impression that 'ghulams' is transliterated from the Arabic.
- al-Bata'ihi ordered a tahwil ('conversion') ... al-Bata'ihi ordered a new cadastral survey (rawk): for GA, I don't have a particularly strong feeling about whether we should give the Arabic and bracket the English, or vice-versa, but we should probably be consistent. Some reviewers would advise sticking to English as far as possible in the main sentence.
- Except that cadastral survey is an English technical term, but 'conversion' is merely the exact translation of the Arabic technical term, for which I am not aware of an equivalent technical term in English.
- increased state income by 50,000 gold dinars: was that a lot? Can we have any idea of what it might have represented in real terms?
- It was a hefty sum; I added a comparison, am on the lookout for something better though.
- the Jew Ibn al-Munajja: is his religion necessary or important here? Would strongly advise cutting or at the very least rephrasing so as not to use it as a noun in apposition, which can read as pejorative.
- Notable in the sense that Jews and Christians played a far more important role in Fatimid administration than in other Muslim states, but you are right, here it doesn't really add much.
- The enterprise proved very costly, which led to the imprisonment of Ibn al-Munajja: passive voice seems odd here: presumably someone imprisoned him?
- Added.
- caliph al-Amir: capitalise Caliph here.
- Done.
- was also re-instituted, after almost a century where it had not been celebrated, as were : could cut where it had not been celebrated (you can't re-institute something that has been continuously celebrated)
- Done.
- Fatimid-Ismai'ili: is this "Fatimid and Ismai'ili" or "that subset of Ismai'ili that was also Fatimid"? If the former, should be an endash.
- The latter, especially as juxtaposed to Nizari Isma'ilism.
- al-Bata'ihi scored a major success: suggest rephrasing per MOS:IDIOM.
- Done.
- al-Imad citation: hyphen in title should be an endash.
- Done.
- Suggest adding a short description.
- Am I right that "Sayyida" is a title/honorific rather than a name? Suggest clarifying in a footnote if so.
- In note B, MOS:WORDSASWORDS would like e.g. al-Afdali either in double quotes or italics.
Image review
- All images have alt text and good captions.
- File:The story of Cairo (1906) (14782234955).jpg: licence checks out.
- File:Cairo, moschea di al-aqmar, 04.JPG: Egypt has freedom of panorama, so all OK here.
- File:Fatimid dinar - al-Amir bi-Ahkam Allah.jpg: technically speaking, needs a PD tag for the original work (the coin). I am honestly a little suspicious that it's genuinely the uploader's own work (it looks like an image used to display a coin on an auction website), but in the absence of a smoking gun I won't push this one.
- Noting that this one isn't done yet. UndercoverClassicist T·C 06:36, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
Source review
All sources appear to be reliable and are formatted consistently.
- Spot checks
- Note 9D: checks out.
- Note 44: checks out.
- Note 33: to support "[the caliph] was a poor public speaker", the source has "he himself, despite his love for ceremonies, did not excel at this task [of preaching]". I would consider changing "public speaker" to "preacher": there are other reasons, other than a lack of eloquence, why someone might not be great at preaching.
@UndercoverClassicist: thanks for taking the time, I think I've dealt with most of the issues above. Constantine ✍ 20:14, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Brilliant -- source review done, just a few bits and pieces there and further up. UndercoverClassicist T·C 06:36, 20 May 2024 (UTC)