Talk:Adolph Luetgert

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Adolph Luetgert. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:06, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with sources[edit]

Websites for guided tours, such as Weird Chicago, are not Reliable Sources. There are no cites given for the content on the Luetgert murder and trials. I put it in External links, as I did the Kelleher, Dark Destinations website, which is a user-generated KNOL site and not considered an RS per Wiki MOS. It is also a dead link.

The Loerzel cites all go back to the same source, his 2007 book, which is excerpted and summarized on the website Alchemy of Bones - also the book title. I changed the cites so they would better show they come from the same source. This book was published by a reputable academic press. The article in the Smithsonian magazine and in the Anthropology journal are also valid Reliable Sources. Parkwells (talk) 23:57, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Trial (last paragraph)[edit]

The last paragraph of the Trial section needs additional citations and some copy-editing. I tagged one sentence as [needs copy edit] because it makes no sense grammatically, and I can't edit it myself because I'm not sure what the writer is trying to assert. Matuko (talk) 20:13, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]