Talk:Adam Zachary Newton

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Philosophy: Philosophers / Contemporary Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Philosophers
	Contemporary philosophy

Notability[edit]

type his name into JSTOR or google books (use more than one spelling to pull up multiple references) and notability is clear American Clio (talk) 21:11, 24 February 2008 (UTC) American Clio[reply]

Original research[edit]

Adam Zachary Newton is widely cited on the subject of how readers engage with text.^[1]^[2]^[3]^[4]^[5]

^ Long, Elizabeth. Book Clubs: Women and the Uses of Reading in Everyday Life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2003. ISBN 0-226-49261-3
^ Karnicky, J. (2007). Contemporary fiction and the ethics of modern culture. New York, N.Y.: Palgrave Macmillan. ISBN 978-1-4039-7760-1
^ Knellwolf, C., Norris, C., & Osborn, J. (2001). The Cambridge history of literary criticism. Vol. 9, Twentieth-century historical, philosophical and psychological perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. p. 380 ISBN 0-521-30014-2
^ Wolfreys, J. (2002). Introducing criticism at the 21st century. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, p. 114 ISBN 0-585-44340-8
^ Davis, T. F., & Womack, K. (2001). Mapping the ethical turn: a reader in ethics, culture, and literary theory. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia, p. 5 ISBN 0-8139-2055-8

I'm pulling this sentence out of the article because I think it goes against Wikipedia's rules on original research. If you want to say that Newton is widely cited, the correct procedure is to cite a published study showing that, not to collect citations yourself. —Paul A (talk) 02:59, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[1] Long, Elizabeth. Book Clubs: Women and the Uses of Reading in Everyday Life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2003. ISBN 0-226-49261-3

[2] Karnicky, J. (2007). Contemporary fiction and the ethics of modern culture. New York, N.Y.: Palgrave Macmillan. ISBN 978-1-4039-7760-1

[3] Knellwolf, C., Norris, C., & Osborn, J. (2001). The Cambridge history of literary criticism. Vol. 9, Twentieth-century historical, philosophical and psychological perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. p. 380 ISBN 0-521-30014-2

[4] Wolfreys, J. (2002). Introducing criticism at the 21st century. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, p. 114 ISBN 0-585-44340-8

[5] Davis, T. F., & Womack, K. (2001). Mapping the ethical turn: a reader in ethics, culture, and literary theory. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia, p. 5 ISBN 0-8139-2055-8

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]