Talk:A Talent for War

Novels: Sci-fi Mid‑importance

	Novels portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Science fiction task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Science Fiction Low‑importance

	Speculative fiction portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Fiction, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science FictionWikipedia:WikiProject Science FictionTemplate:WikiProject Science Fictionscience fiction articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This is the beginning of what I hope will be a comprehensive article on this novel, which will in turn be linked to the article on Jack McDevitt. I have most of the article written off-line and will add to it over the next week or two. My main challenge, not surprisingly, will be to keep the plot summary within proper bounds.

Simmaren 19:05, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The character sketch of Christopher Sim is probably too long, but the length is justified given the importance of the character to both the back-story and the story. I may be able to shorten it, depending on what is in the plot summary. I will also rework some of this material to show a more neutral POV.

Simmaren 00:28, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Query: is the 1989 G.P. Putnam listing shown under "Release Details" correct? I didn't add it and can't find it in the databases I've checked. The inconsistent 31 December 1998 publication date suggests error. Does anyone know? Simmaren 17:17, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re cover in infobox: I own the original 1989 paperback (somewhere) and will substitute a picture of the 1989 cover when I can find it. It appears to be identical to the 2004 paperback edition cover. Simmaren 17:19, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:A Talent For War1.JPG[edit]

Image:A Talent For War1.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 18:27, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:A Talent For War2.JPG[edit]

Image:A Talent For War2.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 18:28, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thermopylae[edit]

Where does the over-emphasis on perceived parallels with Thermopylae come from? I see no references for this and did not find it apparent when reading the book. I don't find it an especially warranted or insightful parallel even when pointed out. I think it is something of a stretch -the closer parallel is to a general-case of small force fighting larger force over a protracted period and failing to gain assistance from its people. That accepted, it far more closely matches the campaigns of eg Hannibal barca. But either this parallel or yours seems barely noteworthy, and original research unless cite given. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.23.114.168 (talk) 18:18, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on A Talent for War. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:11, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]