Talk:A Northern Light

Novels Mid‑importance

	Novels portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Children's literature Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Children's literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Children's literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Children's literatureWikipedia:WikiProject Children's literatureTemplate:WikiProject Children's literaturechildren and young adult literature articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tasks you can do:

Here are some open tasks for WikiProject Children's literature, an attempt to create and standardize articles related to children's literature. Feel free to help with any of the following tasks.

Add {{Portal|Children's literature}} to the See also section of related articles.
Tag the talk pages of related articles with {{WikiProject Children's literature}}
Join WikiProject Children's literature and list yourself as a Participant in the project.
Cleanup: A cleanup listing for this project is available. See also the list by category, the tool's wiki page and the index of WikiProjects.
Deletion discussions: listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Literature
Notability: Articles with notability concerns, listed at WikiProject Notability
Rate the Unassessed articles in the Children's literature WikiProject.
References: Add references to Unreferenced BLPs.
Requested articles: Create a requested article on literature
Stubs: Improve a stub-class article

edit

Plot and characters[edit]

Shouldn't there be more of an explination of the plot? A list of characters perhaps? My eyes see all 03:47, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It is a little odd. I got to this page from Emily Baxter, an article stub about a character in the novel (who also uses the name of Miss Wilcox, apparently) but examining the article I see no sign of either name. This means I cannot decide whether Emily Baxter is an important enough character to have her own article. I think I'll simply merge the article to this one, because the information in that article is brief and almost certainly should all be in this one. --Tony Sidaway 11:14, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Awards[edit]

I've moved the awards section to just underneath the lead because of their real world significance, and tidied up the inline references (thanks to whoever provided these). --Tony Sidaway 11:48, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Four years later I have expanded coverage of the British Carnegie Medal achievements, located that in the lead section, and relegated the rest back to the foot of the article. -P64

Background[edit]

Meanwhile I have moved "Nonfiction element" up from the foot to section 1 --without revising it, although it greatly needs expansion. Probably it should use the common section 1 heading "Background" [or "Origin"]; briefly describe both the 1906 case and what Theodore Dreiser made of it. --P64 (talk) 21:08, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The plot section is too long. It includes Donnelly's fictionalisation of the 1906 episode (using real names and places unlike Dreiser). We do call this a historical novel so an orderly explanation of the historical basis is appropriate. Also Dreiser's fictionalization is much different and he's famous too! We now mention An American Tragedy in the lead and say no more. --P64 (talk) 00:07, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sources[edit]

[ref name=prdir2003] "Press releases for the 2003 Awards, presented in 2004". Press Desk. CILIP. Retrieved 2012-07-28.[/ref]

Two releases 9 July 2004 feature Donnelly and A Gathering Light. See also the earlier release 30 April 2004, "... Judges Comments on the Shortlist".

The CILIP "Shadowing Site" seems at a glance to serve a youth program for the current/latest year, without any archive, but old material may be available.

-P64 2012-07-28; --P64 (talk) 00:07, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Today during visit for another purpose, I have inserted a formal reference to those 2003 CILIP press releases without using them substantially.

References to the novel by page, such as "Donnelly, p. 327", need support by a formal citation of the edition --once at the bottom of section References. We should use the first edition if possible. Can anyone confirm or correct whether the current page references do fit the first edition?

Example: Tamar (novel)#References

--P64 (talk) 21:25, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on A Northern Light. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:52, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]